Writing Chapter 4: The Results of Your Research Study

The purpose of this chapter is to summarize the collected data and the statistical treatment, and/or mechanics, of analysis. The first paragraph should briefly restate the problem, taken from Chapter 1. Explain the object of each experiment, question, or objective, point out salient results, and present those results by table, figure, or other form of summarized data. Select tables and figures carefully. Some studies are easier to defend if all the raw data is in this chapter; some are better if the bulk of the raw data is in an appendix.

In a quantitative study, the results usually begin with a description of the sample (e.g., sample size, description of participants who were excluded and why, handling of missing data). Next, descriptive statistics (e.g., frequencies/percentages for categorical variables, means, standard deviations, and ranges for continuously measured variables) are presented. Normality of continuously measured variables is usually presented. Address each hypothesis in turn, presenting a description of the analysis that was computed to address each hypothesis and the results of that analysis. State whether the null hypothesis was rejected.

Do not repeat in tedious prose what it is obvious for a knowledgeable peer to see at a glance.  The dissertation advisor usually has an opinion about the level of detail needed in this chapter.  Table titles and figure captions should be understandable without reading the chapter text. Note all relevant results, even those that were contrary to the alternative hypotheses, or those that tend to distract from clear determinations.

Make statements of the results without any implication, speculation, assessment, evaluation, or interpretation. Sometimes the results and discussion are combined into one chapter, but in general, keep the results, and the conclusions and discussion separate.

In a qualitative study, the results often include many quotes from participants who were interviewed.

Source: Barbara von Diether, EdD

Network Coordinator

Network Coordinator at A+ English, LLC
Formed in 1998, Book Editing Associates is a one-stop shop for writers who need professional book editors, tested proofreaders, published ghostwriters, and publishing consultants.
Network Coordinator

Network Coordinator

Formed in 1998, Book Editing Associates is a one-stop shop for writers who need professional book editors, tested proofreaders, published ghostwriters, and publishing consultants.

10 thoughts on “Writing Chapter 4: The Results of Your Research Study

  • June 14, 2017 at 2:16 am
    Permalink

    Dear consultants,

    Now that I have started collecting qualitative data (semi-structured interviews, partly based on photographs, partly on topics) I find that my Original Research Questions do not fit to the full the findings. Or, to put it in other words: Are my research questions still the right ones?
    I look forward to your replying.

    Reply
    • June 14, 2017 at 8:31 am
      Permalink

      I think the most important thing to say here is: “You need to discuss this with your committee — and committees may well differ.” If I were on your committee (and I do serve on many committees for qualitative work) I would say that research questions always evolve as the study progresses. This is certainly true in qualitative research, perhaps not quite as true in quantitative research. You should regard your original questions as nothing more than a point of departure, not as an iron-clad contract. In fact, I would go further and say that you don’t make a final decision about what your study is all about until you publish it — and you may still be revising your ideas for several years after that!

      However, mine may be an iconoclastic position — it is based solely on my personal experience (50 years of doing and supervising interview research) — the bottom line is, “You have to do whatever your committee tells you to do.”

      Rick Oaks
      DissertationWriting.com
      Mixed Methods Research, Questionnaire Design, Education, Psychology, Sociology
      http://bit.ly/2lZsFb8

      Reply
      • August 26, 2017 at 2:27 pm
        Permalink

        I chuckled at this: “You have to do whatever your committee tells you to do.” But so true! Thanks!

        Reply
        • August 26, 2017 at 3:43 pm
          Permalink

          I edited dissertations for a university near me. We would do two cover pages: one that included the committee members as co-writers, and one that didn’t include them. They’d sign the approval page for the version that had their names on it — because they wouldn’t sign without it. The student would turn in the cover page that didn’t have the committee members’ names. Poor student with one more hurdle at the end. – Network Coordinator, Dissertation editors network – http://DissertationWriting.com

          Reply
  • December 7, 2018 at 10:26 am
    Permalink

    Please How can I write a result on a practical project carried out on local tomato paste processing method.

    Reply
  • July 3, 2019 at 1:11 pm
    Permalink

    Good day, please I have a study question for an exam which I don’t know how to tackle it. It say ” a good research thesis will have link from chapter 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Critically discuss typical thesis showing how these links are established and why are the links important for a higher degree thesis of business research. ”

    Please I need help on how to answer this question. Thanks

    Reply
  • September 5, 2019 at 9:03 am
    Permalink

    this has been very helpful. Thanks

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Liza Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *